[Neurons] 2026 Neurons #16 DEALING WITH SYMPTOMS

[L. Michael Hall]

From: L. Michael Hall
2026 Neurons #16
April 13, 2026
Problem Solving Expertise #16

DEALING WITH SYMPTOMS

Where there are problems, there are almost always symptoms.  Incredibly
there are many times when the symptoms feel worse than the problem.
Although at other times, the symptom may seem like the solution to the
problem.  Given that, how can you tell the difference?  Obviously most of
the time, symptoms are problematic even though not the problem.  At other
times, the symptom may be a partial solution and partial problem—it may
have secondary gains while also creating new problems.

Problems are generally renown for producing undesired symptoms ... and the
symptoms often are what “cries for attention.”  Because of that, they
function as the squeaky wheel which grabs our attention.  As a result,
unless we are thinking clearly and precisely, we can end up thinking that
the symptom is the problem.  In actuality, it is a result of a problem.
That’s why good problem-solving distinguishes problem from symptom.

Yet it is very tempting is to go after the symptom.  Why?  Because
typically that is where the noise is.  It’s where the pain is, and it is
often what you can ameliorate with a quick fix.  But symptomatic solutions
and quick fixes only cover up the problem without addressing the actual
problem.  While symptomatic solutions are usually well-intended, and work
at first, in the long run they make things worse because they mask the real
problem.

Yet not all symptoms are the same.  There are many different kinds of
symptoms and different levels of symptoms.  Given that the kind of thinking
that creates problems occur at multiple levels, so do symptoms.  To
distinguish the levels, when you identify a symptom or hear of one, begin
by asking: “About what?”   Or “Because ...?”   This will help to identify
the thinking level behind the symptom.  Here are the three levels of
symptoms that I’ve introduced in The 5 Minute Manager training.

First Level Symptoms
First level symptoms are primary emotions and so constitute direct
symptoms.  These symptoms reveal how the emotions show up in the body as
emotional expressions (how anger shows up; how fear, sadness, etc.).  These
symptoms make sense: the thinking leads directly to the emotion as a
symptom.  They are linear, direct, and close in time and space.  Who can
solve problems at this level?  Generally anyone with a little training in
NLP and Neuro-Semantics.  Anyone could learn how to identify the symptoms,
separate it from the real problem, and solve the distorted immediate
thinking that creates the problem.

Second Level Symptoms
The ‘emotions’ of the symptoms at this level are secondary emotions.  They
are partially an emotion and partially a judgment (evaluation).  They are
created by the meta-stating process.  Whereas ‘sad’ is directly related to
a specific loss, ‘depression’ is generalized and abstract, “I’m depressed
about life.”  “I’m depressed because no one will ever love me.”  The
connection between thinking and the emotional symptom is not immediately
obvious and therefore may not ‘make sense.’  It may be a function of the
person’s psycho-logics— the inner reasoning by which the person created
some distorted thinking and therefore the secondary symptom.

Who can solve problems with this level of symptoms?  Basically someone
trained and skilled in the Meta-Coaching methodology.  The person could
handle this level of symptoms by recognizing them and solving the distorted
thinking problems that arise from the interface of state upon state,
thought upon thought, feeling upon feeling.

Third Level Symptoms
The symptoms at this level are mostly outside-of-conscious awareness
(unconscious).  As a result, the person experiencing the problem is more
likely to identify the problem as caused by something external.  Yet in
reality, these symptoms come from unquestioned assumptions, the person’s
‘way of being’ in the world (his style or character) seems to him ‘normal.’
 Often it is not even a problem for him.  It is just the way things are.

Who can solve problems at this level?  Generally Professional Therapists.
A person needs to have the required psychotherapy knowledge and skills and
be skilled in being able to recognize these hidden symptoms, and call them
out.  This means working with blind spots and unconscious patterns by
inferring what’s implied in the person’s assumptions and presuppositions.

An Example of Symptom Levels
1) John’s symptom –> Anger.  “What are you angry about?”  How Jim treats
me; he violates my values of respect by raising his voice, using a
patronizing tone, and calling him ‘boy.’
Direct symptom. The symptom reveals a linear cause-effect. It is close in
time and space and the cause is specific—Jim’s words, tone, and
verbalizations.  These distinctions tell you that the symptom makes sense.
As an emotional symptom, the energy can be put to good use.  How?  By
accepting the emotion, embracing it as an emotion, following it back to the
thinking out of which it came.  Then using the energy of the anger for a
conversation with Jim, asking for some change of behavior.  In the
conversation, ask, “Is the emotion appropriate?  How could you use its
energy to bring about a change?”
2) John’s symptom –> Anger.  “What are you angry about?”  I’m angry at
being angry because anger makes me a bad person (identity); I don’t want to
be a bad person, so I will focus on making the anger go away (via denial,
suppression, condemnation).  Then as a second level symptom John now feels
an emotional deadness; he says he feels nothing, that he thinks he is a
wimp.
Indirect/ layered symptom.  There is no obvious cause-effect connection or
specific trigger.  The cause and trigger are general and abstract, and not
close in time and space.  His anger-at-his-anger kills his emotions so he
feels nothing.  In this way he has mis-handled his first problem.  He did
not give his anger permission to be and himself permission to learn from it.

3) John’s symptom –> Anger.  “What are you angry about?”  I’m angry at
feeling emotionally dead and lifeless within.  He says, “I have no passion
for anything; nothing moves me.”  He now misunderstands his own situation.
He thinks, “I have a motivation problem.”  But he does not have a
motivation problem.  That’s his false solution of denying his emotions and
to ‘solve’ it will not get to the real problem.
Now the symptom is even more indirect.   It arises from mis-handling the
first problem.  His ‘secondary gain’ of not being bothered by his anger
came at the cost of losing touch with his emotions.  Now he has another
problem on top of the first one.  All this severely complicates
problem-solving as it distracts and confuses.

4) John’s symptom –> Anger.  At the assumptive level, John may have grown
up in a family culture that not only forbid all anger, but treated anger as
an existential issue or threat— to feel anger demonstrates you are ‘bad to
the core’ and have no hope of being a decent human being.  None of this
would be conscious.  It would be a feeling, and lead to other unconscious
symptoms.
Symptom: An existential despair, depression, hopelessness, helplessness.

The bottom line?  All symptoms are not the same.  Some are simple and
direct; they show up in the body immediately.  Some are layered by multiple
thoughts and feelings and as such generate gestalt states and symptoms.
Yet others arise from unconscious beliefs, understandings, and frames and
so make up one’s assumed ontology and/or epistemology.  Consequently, in
problem-solving, a key skill is learning to distinguish these levels of
symptoms and address them.

L. Michael Hall, Ph.D.
Executive Director, Neuro-Semantics International
738 Beaver Lodge
Grand Junction, Colorado, USA  81505
(970) 523-7877
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://neurosemanticsegroups.org/pipermail/neurons_neurosemanticsegroups.org/attachments/20260413/7588e19a/attachment.html>